COMP 2711H: Lecture 3
Date: 2024-09-03 23:47:29
Reviewed:
Topic / Chapter: Induction, Well-ordering and Infinite Descent
summary
❓Questions
Notes
Proof from Peano Axiom
-
Definition of +
- definition will be recursive
- define some terms
- ...
- rules
-
- addition of 0 (identity)
-
- addition of a number, that is successor of something else
-
-
Prove
1+1=2
-
Prove
2+2=4
2+2=4
means- furthermore:
-
Definition of
- rules
- 👨🏫 can you define division?
- rules
-
Mathematical induction
- to show holds
- it is sufficient to show
- holds
- aka: induction base
-
- inductive step
- holds
-
Definition of
- 👨🏫 other, better definitions exist!
-
Problems
- prove that
- inductive base
- inductive step
Well-Ordering Principle
-
Well-ordering principle
- every non-empty subset A contains a least / smallest element
- alternatively: set of is "well-ordered" by its natural / magnitude order
- i.e. in order
- : can be 0
- i.e. in order
- principle: mostly driven from mathematical induction
- taken as granted from Peano axioms
- : the smallest inductive set
- one can show: set of all natural no. s.t. " is well-ordered" is inductive
- and therefore must contain all natural no.
- 👨🎓 ~= reverse direction of mathematical induction?
-
Proof by infinite descent
- aka Fermat's method of descent
- you can't have an infinite sequence of s.t.
- particular kind of "proof by contradiction"
- showing: if the statement was to hold a number
- => it can hold a smaller number
- => has lower bound (0); thus it's wrong
- relies on the well-ordering principle
- often used to show that no solution exists
Proof Examples
-
Problem 2: proof on irrationality of
- theorem:
- let and
- i.e. is even => is also even
- thus
- a ever-smaller fraction can be found, infinitely!
- which is impossible, or is a "contradiction"
- i.e. no such integer exists!
- 👨🏫 also, keep in mind:
-
Proof in well-ordering principle
- let
- proof by contradiction
- step
- if is not empty, there must be smallest set from
- let be smallest number from
- however: we can obtain a even smaller member based on
- thus: it must be the case that is empty
- if is not empty, there must be smallest set from
-
Proving: "There are infinitely many prime numbers"
- let be all the primes
- if is prime: premise is wrong as is not in the list
- if
- it must be the case that is a prime that's not on the list
- (contradiction)
- or: can be factorized to
- it must be the case that is a prime that's not on the list
- and so on,
- and
- however: the sequence must be finite (infinite descent)
- and the last element of the sequence, must be a prime
- that is not on the list!
- q.e.d.
-
Problem 4 (Pigeonhole principle)
- if we have holes and pigeons are put in them
- a hole w/ at least two pigeons
- (for )
- proof by induction
- base case: starts from
- there is only 1 hole, with 2 pigeons
- so there is a hole w/ 2 pigeons
- induction step:
- for -th hole, you can either put
- 2 pigeons: problem solved
- 1 pigeon: , which is premise
- 0 pigeon: is sufficient as there are more than pigeons already
- for -th hole, you can either put
- base case: starts from
- if we have holes and pigeons are put in them
-
False proof: all cars are the same color
- base case: when , cars have the same color!
- induction step
- first cars have the same color
- and last cars have the same color too
- 👨🏫 yeah, all crs have the same color!
- it's wrong when !
- and you can't prove that
-
False proof: all man are bald
- base case: if you have 0 threads of hair, you are bald!
- inductive case: if a man with threads of hair is bald, having threads doesn't really make you not bald either!
- thus, all man (unless they have negative or fractional hair) are bald!
-
Problem 5: players take part in a tournament
- every player plays against every other player
- and every game has one winner
- prove that there exists a permutation
- s.t. has lost to
- proof
- when , the case holds
- if we can sort for players
- for , has it won over ?
- if so, we can place it after
- if there was no place to put , it shows that it has won against no one
- in which, we can put in the first place
- for , has it won over ?
- every player plays against every other player
-
Proving induction is valid
- roadmap
- show infinite descent well ordering (1)
- show induction holds from well-ordering
- let be a non-empty set w/o a smallest element
- pick any
- and : must be another non-empty set w/o a smallest element
- and smaller than
- else: proof ends
- pick any
- and : must be another non-empty set w/o a smallest element
- and smaller than // infinite descent!
- thus: based on infinite descent principle, well ordering holds
- let be a set of all of natural number s.t.
- i.e. trying to prove the fifth Peano axiom
- proving: ; suppose (contradiction)
- // A: non-empty (by definition)
- let be the smallest element of
- is not in
- thus, is also not in
- however, is smaller than , and it also shouldn't be in either!
- roadmap